Archive

Outcomes

What five installments have produced so far. Survey numbers are aggregates from the anonymous exit survey sent one week after each event; the event reports have the full results.

127
alumni
2022 to 2026
84
projects
32
recorded lectures
15
countries in one cohort
2023, Granada

Participation by year

InstallmentParticipantsInstitutionsCountriesProjectsReport
NeuroDataReHack 20262418720PDF
NeuroDataReHack 20252421810PDF
NeuroDataReHack 20242016918PDF
NeuroDataReHack 202331251518PDF
NeuroDataReHack 202228 of 52 applicants22518PDF

Exit survey

YearResponsesOverall experienceWould recommendEase of getting help
NeuroDataReHack 2026224.86 / 54.95 / 55 / 5
NeuroDataReHack 2025214.86 / 5—5 / 5
NeuroDataReHack 2024205 / 5——
  • 2026: 17 of 22 respondents rated the six-day length as just right. 13 of 22 asked for more tutorials on using AI agents effectively.
  • 2025: 18 of 21 respondents rated the overall experience 5 out of 5 and the other three rated it 4. All 21 learned about community analysis and visualization tools, 20 learned how to read data from DANDI, 18 learned the NWB standard and its software, and 17 learned to use DANDI Hub. The NWB and DANDI training talks averaged 4.90 out of 5 and the dataset and tool lectures 4.48. 11 of 21 rated the five-day length as just right and 8 found it too short, which led to the six-day format in 2026.
  • 2024: Every survey respondent rated the overall experience 5 out of 5. 100% reported making connections with peers, 95% learned the NWB standard and community analysis tools, and 90% learned to use DANDI Hub for cloud-based analysis. 15 of 20 rated the five-day duration as ideal.

Public outputs

Code, results, and presentations that participants made public during or after the week. This list grows as alumni report back; the one-year follow-up survey asks about publications and software.